Lower Middle Market Valuation Trends: EBITDA Multiples and Earnout Structure for Independent Sponsors

By John J. Koeppel

September 20, 2026 | Corporate Blog
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD A PDF VERSION

What Are the Valuation Trends for Independent Sponsors/Buyers Acquiring Lower Middle Market Companies? 


  • Valuations continue to scale with size: the median earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) multiple is 5.7x adjusted EBITDA for companies with $10 million to $25 million in enterprise value (EV), 7.6x for $25 million to $50 million, and 9.4x for $50 million to $200 million.
  • Buyers commonly cite a "scarcity of quality targets" in the lower middle market.
  • Price gains are concentrating in stronger, higher-margin companies rather than spreading evenly across the market.
    • Targets with above-industry-average profit margins can command almost one full EBITDA multiple more than targets with below-average margins.
  • To address the valuation gap between buyers and sellers, "earnouts are functioning less as a concession and more as a core structuring tool in today's market."
  • In today's earnout structure, earnouts average 16.5% of enterprise value and run a median of 24 months.
  • Other investment bankers report that lower middle market buyers are holding back more cash at close and, in addition to rollover equity, using more earnouts and seller financing for business acquisitions (some with contingent payment structures). 

John J. Koeppel, leader of Lippes Mathias' independent sponsor and private equity practice teams, comments on add-on acquisition pricing in "Private Equity Buyers Pay Up for Small Add-Ons as Middle-Market Multiples Climb to 6.9x," Private Equity Professional, August 27, 2026. 

Disclaimer: The information in this post is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from our firm or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.


Stay Informed



This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze traffic. To learn more about cookies and how we use them, please review our Privacy Policy. To continue use of this website, you must provide your consent to its use of cookies by clicking the "Accept" button.