Another Pharmaceutical Company Settles FCPA Matter with SEC
September 23, 2016 | Corporate Blog
On August 30, 2016 the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) settled charges with AstraZeneca, a U.K.-based pharmaceutical company, under the books and records and internal control provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”). The SEC alleged that AstraZeneca’s wholly-owned subsidiaries in China and Russia violated the FCPA by making improper payments to doctors at government healthcare facilities to enhance AstraZeneca pharmaceutical sales and minimize pending sanctions. The improper payments were effected by creation of fraudulent tax receipts and travel invoices, and by specious speaker fees, and improper payments to government officials. Under the settlement, in which AstraZeneca neither admitted nor denied the SEC’s allegations, AstraZeneca is to disgorge $4.325 million, and pay a $375,000 civil penalty and $822,000 in prejudgment interest.
The SEC’s settlement order states that AstraZeneca waived its statute of limitations defenses. The waiver is significant because AstraZeneca’s misconduct allegedly ended in 2010, and the FCPA statute of limitations is five years. Recently the SEC has conducted a number of FCPA investigations of pharmaceutical industry companies. Some, but not all, of these companies settling with SEC are SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lily; and Johnson & Johnson.
For further information, see the SEC’s administrative order and press release.
To discuss this matter and how the FCPA may apply to your SEC reporting company, contact Michael E. Storck at 716-853-5100 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Disclaimer: The information in this post is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from our firm or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.
United States Patent and Trademark Office Reduces Trademark Office Action Response Deadline
November 1, 2022
In The news
Michael E. Storck Listed in The Daily Record’s "Power 20 Intellectual Property 2022"
September 23, 2022
Michael E. Storck Named Among the Western New York Daily Record’s 2022 Intellectual Property Power 20
September 22, 2022
Lippes Mathias taps former Mars Incorporated Senior Leader to Co-Lead Intellectual Property Team
April 20, 2021