Comparing Two Non-Immigrant Status Types: E-1 and O-1

February 18, 2019 | Immigration
Often when clients approach us, they have an idea of what type of non-immigrant (temporary) status they are seeking. They’ve spoken to friends/colleagues who have shared their experiences, researched online or even met with other U.S. immigration attorneys. Having decided on their strategy, they ask us about fees, processing times and retaining our services.

However, during our first consultation with these individuals, we ask them to take a step back – it could be very well that their researched approach may be the right one for them – but we want to make sure that we’ve thoroughly explored their options before deciding and investing in a U.S. strategy – make sure that they have considered all the angles/options. We ask questions about their long-term plans for the U.S., their families and their accompanying needs, etc.

For example, an individual who wants to ensure that their spouse can obtain employment authorization in the U.S. will want to ideally pursue a non-immigrant status that allows for derivative spouses to receive an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) – such as E-1’s, E-2’s and L-1’s. Other categories, such as TN’s and O-1’s, do not allow for spouses to receive an EAD.

Two categories that we often end up comparing are E-1 (treaty trader) and O-1 (a temporary non-immigrant status reserved for individuals of extraordinary ability in their field).

To help them decide which category best suited their goals and business model, we provided them with a comparison of the two categories:
image.png 40.2 KB

image.png 39.3 KB

Disclaimer: The information in this post is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from our firm or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.


Stay Informed

Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman Logo Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman Alternate Logo